JPG vs PNG vs WebP vs AVIF: How to Choose
No format wins every use case: JPEG, WebP, and AVIF suit photos; PNG, lossless WebP, and AVIF suit transparency and crisp graphics; JPEG or PNG remain safest when compatibility is absolute.
The essential differences
| Format | Compression | Transparency | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPEG/JPG | Lossy | No | Photos, universal sharing, older software |
| PNG | Lossless | Yes | Screenshots, icons, text, transparent backgrounds |
| WebP | Lossy or lossless | Yes | Modern websites and a balanced workflow |
| AVIF | Lossy or lossless | Yes | Modern delivery focused on compression efficiency |
A file extension does not determine quality on its own. Encoder settings and image content matter just as much. A JPEG saved at an excessively low quality can show more blocking and banding than a sensibly encoded WebP or AVIF; a simple icon saved as high-quality JPEG can be both larger and softer than PNG.
Choose for the content, not for fashion
- Camera photos: JPEG is the compatibility baseline. WebP often reduces size further at a similar visual quality. AVIF makes sense when a modern-site fallback is available.
- Product screenshots: small text and straight edges expose lossy artifacts, so begin with PNG and test lossless WebP if size is high.
- Transparent icons: PNG is a safe default. WebP and AVIF preserve alpha too, but the rest of the workflow must support them.
- Archival masters: do not keep only a lossy export. Preserve the RAW, TIFF, or high-quality master and create delivery versions separately.
How to test the formats in tinysqueeze
- Choose three representative files: a portrait, a detailed landscape, and an interface image with text or transparency.
- Keep the same dimensions and export JPEG, WebP, and AVIF. Include PNG only where lossless output makes sense.
- Inspect hair, text edges, sky gradients, and shadows at 100% zoom.
- Compare file size and destination compatibility, then choose the batch output.
Do not judge only by thumbnails. Compression defects often hide in dark areas, gentle gradients, and sharp high-contrast edges. Smart auto searches for a lower JPEG/WebP/AVIF quality that still reaches its SSIM target, but a human should make the final call for important work.
A robust format stack for websites
A modern site can use the <picture> element to offer AVIF, WebP, and a JPEG/PNG fallback in that order. The browser picks the first source it can decode. If a CMS or build process cannot maintain multiple variants, WebP with a conventional fallback is often the simplest place to start.
When conversion changes URLs, update HTML references, caches, and relevant image records. Avoid replacing an entire historical library only because a format is newer; begin with the largest assets on the most visited pages and measure the result.
References
Your files are processed in the current browser and are not uploaded as article samples.